![]() |
About Us | Email Newsletter | Advertisers | Buyer's Guide | Subscribe | Privacy Policy | RSS | |||
|
| ||||
|
advertisement | ||||
|
|
Fuel costs: Q&A with two experts By Wendy Leavitt, director of editorial development Jul 25, 2008 10:16 AM The first in a series of three free Webcasts on fuel-saving strategies and technologies presented by Fleet Owner and Truckload Carriers Association was held in June. The event, which took an in-depth look at the operations side of running a fleet, was sponsored by TMW Systems and attended by 360 people. Participants had plenty of tough questions for the two speakers--consultant George L. Edwards, founder and president of George L. Edwards and Associates, and Ray Haight, executive director of MacKinnon Transport, Inc. Some of the best questions are below. The second Webcast in the series, “Help drivers help you survive the fuel crisis,” will be on August 5 at 2:00 p.m. EDT. There is no charge to attend. Register at: www.fleetowner.com/fuel-webcast. Q: Should you attempt to dominate one lane rather than dabble in several?advertisement Edwards: Lane density is very important in revenue generation and profit maximization. I believe that being very prominent in one or a limited number of lanes is superior to dabbling in many lanes. The major advantage is that you can build customer loyalty on both ends of the lane or geographic area. This is most true at the origin point of the outbound lane and most certainly helps at the termination point(s) of the lane. Obviously, with greater frequency over a lane at more concentrated termination points, the more reliable your service to customers who will work with you for return haul or onward movements. This approach is far superior in developing "Core Customers" throughout the lane. I do not like the shotgun approach because it causes too much reliability on the spot market for loads. Spot market rates are lower than those for proprietary customers. Proprietary customers also provide better cash flow and payment performance. Q: You need miles to cover costs. What choices do you have on lanes where you are not covering costs? Raise rates? Give up the lane? Edwards: By and large, trucking is a high variable and relatively low fixed-cost business. Variable costs (wages, fuel, maintenance, tire costs, certain taxes and insurance) make up 65 to 75% (in most cases) of the total cost structure for operating a truck. Therefore, if a unit is not in operation, most of the costs are not incurred. With this type of cost structure, just running miles is not the best solution. The “power lanes,” lanes over which you make your best revenues and profits, are not difficult to identify and work within. It is the “grey areas” that cause the difficult decisions. What you must do in all cases is cover your out-of-pocket or variable costs to run the unit. If you can get enough revenue to cover your variable costs plus some to offset your fixed costs, that is better yet. Obviously, revenue that covers fully allocated costs plus a bit for profit is the best scenario. If your revenue is not sufficient to cover at least variable or out-of-pocket costs, then you would be better off financially not to run the load or the lane. In most cases, if the carrier is able to show legitimate proof of costs to a customer, the carrier can obtain some adjustments that help offset the actual incurred expenses. Also applicable to this situation is how many customers you have for return or onward movements over the respective lane(s). Obviously, if you have a good population of customers that you do not have to deadhead too far to pickup the next load, this would factor into the price of the outbound movement for the lane. Q: How do you “sell” the benefits of a satellite communications/tracking system to your owner-operators? Q: We are a small fleet. We monitor our drivers, but if a driver is not meeting our performance goals, what can we do? Fire him? Just go out of business? Q: How do you reward drivers for meeting expected miles per gallon and idling goals? The types of rewards for drivers are as varied as the imagination of all concerned in establishing the program. Some examples of well-founded rewards are:
Q: How do you determine if/when you need an automated dispatch system? Q: Some potential customers want only asset-based companies working for them, but when we quote a rate, it is too high because of the broker. What can we do in this case? Many motor carriers and brokers can quote reduced prices. However, not all of these entities can consistently provided the various services and levels of service mandated by the respective customer. There are good, reputable carriers and brokers that compete in the marketplace, but there are also carriers and brokers who may try to "buy" the business with unusually low rates at the outset of the relationship. This does not make it easy for a service provider to have the initial offer accepted. However, if you cannot make an honest and reasonable profit by providing the service, you are better off to pass on working with that specific shipper. You must always strive to create a win/win situation for the customer and your company. I recognize that this is much easier said than done. However, many times when a service offer is rejected in favor of a lower price, the cheaper service provider cannot live up to the expectations of the shipper and the higher quality service provider ultimately gets the account. Q: What percentage MPG improvement can you get by implementing progressive shifting? The absolute showstopper is the driver. With a cooperative, professional driver, the results will probably exceed expectations. With a driver that fails to cooperate and fully develop his/her skills as a professional driver, the results will not meet expectations. Q: Your internal quality improvements are significant. At what percentage of implementation are you currently? |
|
|||||||||||||||
| Back to Top | |||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|