Spike in traffic fatalities sparks safety concerns

A projected 13.5% jump in traffic fatalities as tracked by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in the first quarter this year compared to the same quarter in 2011 is sparking concerns among safety experts who – by and large – hope the fatality surge represents a one-time aberration and not an unwelcome trend.

“The first quarter fatality numbers are a bad sign, despite all of the efforts from all the safety advocates in the field,” David Kelly, former NHTSA Acting Administrator and now president of consulting firm Storm King Strategies, told Fleet Owner. “Hopefully, this is just an anomaly and the rest of the year will rebound.”

NHTSA’s estimates 7,630 people died in motor vehicle traffic crashes in the first quarter of 2012; a 13.5% increase over the 6,720 fatalities logged in the first quarter of 2011. The agency noted that one possible explanation for the significant jump in fatalities could be due to what it termed “the unseasonably warmer winter than usual in most areas of the country,” leading more people to drive than normal.

“It should be noted that the rate for the first quarter each year is traditionally significantly lower than the rates for the other three quarters, potentially due to, but not restricted to, the effects of winter weather,” NHTSA said in a statement. “Consequently, the fatality rate for the first quarter should not be used to make inferences for the fatality rate for the whole of 2012.”

However, preliminary data reported by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) showed that vehicle miles traveled (VMT) in the first three months of 2012 only increased by about 9.7 billion miles, or just 1.4%. As a result, the fatality rate for the first three months of 2012 increased significantly to 1.10 fatalities per 100 million VMT, up from 0.98 fatalities per 100 million VMT in the first quar­ter of 2011, according to NHTSA.

The agency added that if those projections for the first quarter of 2012 are realized, it will represent the second larg­est year-to-year quarterly increase in fatalities since NHTSA began recording traffic fatalities in 1975.

Still, the agency stressed that those first quarter fatality numbers and percentages must considered in context with the long decline in traffic deaths over the last several years.

“While it is too soon to speculate on the contributing factors or poten­tial implications of any increase in deaths on our roadways, it should be noted that the historic downward trend in traffic fatalities in the past several years—a pattern which has con­tinued through the early estimates for 2011 released recently that show deaths at a 60-year low—means any comparison will be to an unprecedented low baseline figure,” NHTSA said.

Indeed, first quarter fatali­ties declined by about 30% over the last five years, according to the agency’s data: dropping from 9,558 fatalities in the first quarter of 2006 to 6,720 fatalities in the first quarter of 2011, before spiking upwards to 7,630 in the first quarter this year. 

Discuss this Article 3

Joe Ferguson (not verified)
on Jul 24, 2012

Thankatakitiess Fleet Owner for the info but what does this have to do with Fleets Owners? Are these heavy Class 8 fatalities or even related or just speeding 4 wheelers texting and driving? What does this really mean? Nothing but a spike and no one knows why. cars, medium duty trucks, class 8 ???? Many unknowns inthis report>

Anonymous (not verified)
on Jul 27, 2012

You know this really gets me, and has for the last 50 ++ years.
It is a well known fact that accidents involving trucks and other vehicles the at fault is in higher percentage with an automobile that with the truck YET authorities always look to push for more truck safety instead of where is should be pushed.
Trucks, and truck drivers today, are the safest in the history of trucking, accidents and fatalities are the lowest in trucking history, still governmental agencies want to blame trucking for all the woes on the highways when it is not the trucking industry causing the problem.
Put the blame, if any, where it belongs on the governmental agencies and the general motoring public.
You can see it everyday on the highway, if you just PAY attention to the interaction of smaller vehicles with large trucks.
Let's put some of these tax dollars out there to REAL work and face the reality of human nature and educate the drivers that really are the cause of the problems.
We all make mistakes that's why they are called "accidents" but the number of "at fault" accidents caused by the largest group of drivers invariably falls downhill to increase the costs and regulation of the "smaller" group of drivers.

Anonymous (not verified)
on Jul 28, 2012

The average car driver thinks a big rig reacts just like a car. Maybe the government should get off it's butt and start placing some public service & safety ads and commercials on the dynamics of big rigs, in an effort to educate the general public. Make specific points to show the general public that their own actions, can and do cause unavoidable situations that result in accidents.

Please or Register to post comments.

Newsletter Signup

Search 2.5+ million listings

Buyer's Guide

Connect With Us