Truck On Highway 1 5e0f49635a998

Consistent naming conventions help eliminate confusion

Jan. 3, 2020
The trucking industry is famous for using different names for the same thing. Usually folks are able to figure out what is being talked about, but the various names can cause confusion.

The trucking industry is famous for using different names for the same thing. Usually folks are able to figure out what is being talked about, but the various names can cause confusion.

I recently heard of an effort on the part of the automotive industry to try to come up with some standardization for advanced driver assistance systems. And while AAA, Consumer Reports, J.D. Power and the National Safety Council are focused on bringing consistency to the auto industry, I think their idea has some merit for trucking.

Consistency in naming seems especially smart when we are talking about safety-related technologies — after all, that is what advanced driver assistance systems are.

On the automotive side, AAA found that there are as many as 20 different names for a single advanced driver assistance system feature. It also found that marketing was prioritized over clarity of meaning. To be clear, the groups are not proposing that we do away with names for manufacturer’s proprietary systems and packages. Rather they are hoping consistent names of features on window stickers, owner manuals and other marketing materials will allow purchasers to gain a better understanding of the technology and to be able to compare features more easily.

The groups’ efforts are focusing on five broad categories:

  • Driving control assistance
  • Collision warning
  • Collision intervention
  • Parking assistance
  • Other driver assistance systems

Within each of these categories are specific products like adaptive cruise control, active driving assistance and lane keeping assistance; they are grouped under the driving control assistance heading. You can find the complete list on the National Safety Council website. Each of the specific technologies includes a basic definition of what it is designed to do.

Clarity is essential and having the same thing called by the same name allows for a more accurate comparison and provides some assurance that you will, in fact, get what you want.

I know that cars and trucks are different and what makes sense for the automotive industry does not necessarily make sense for the trucking industry. However, in this case I think the car folks are onto something. With so much new technology coming on the market, wouldn’t it be nice if we had some consistency in what we call things? I sure think so.

About the Author

Joseph Evangelist

Joseph Evangelist previously served as EVP for Transervice, president of LLT International Inc., and CEO of Lend Lease Trucks Inc. Evangelist is a seasoned transportation executive with domestic and international experience in sales, operations, mergers, and acquisitions.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!

Sponsored Recommendations

What challenges are top of mind for fleet professionals in 2025? Get exclusive insights from the 2025 Fleet Trends Survey and discover where the industry is headed next.
The most successful fleets accomplish more than delivering freight. To accomplish this, fleets need a fuel that’s reliable, more economical and more sustainable. That fuel is ...
Are your KPIs driving real fleet improvement? Learn how to set smarter, data-driven benchmarks, track success like top-performing fleets, and apply proven strategies to optimize...
Learn how eets can enhance truck utilization and minimize safety incidents using business intelligence and AI. Delve into innovative practices, technology integration and real...