Refrigeratedtransporter 2907 Fuso Fe160 Street View

FUSO outperforms Hino, Isuzu trucks in third-party testing

Sept. 18, 2017
Mitsubishi Fuso Truck of America Inc (FUSO) has announced completion of outside, third-party testing by Automotive Testing & Development Services Inc (ATDS), comparing the fuel economy of the Class 4 FUSO FE160 Series medium-duty cabover truck with the Class 4 Isuzu NPR-HD and Hino 155.

Mitsubishi Fuso Truck of America Inc (FUSO) has announced completion of outside, third-party testing by Automotive Testing & Development Services Inc (ATDS), comparing the fuel economy of the Class 4 FUSO FE160 Series medium-duty cabover truck with the fuel economy of an equivalent Class 4 Isuzu NPR-HD and Hino 155.

Over the course of testing, the FE160 consumed 8% less diesel fuel on average than the Hino 155, and 5% less than the Isuzu NPR-HD, measured over a course of city, suburban and highway driving. When ECO mode was engaged on the FE160 (a feature not available on the Hino or Isuzu models), the FE160’s fuel consumption advantage improved to 10% less than the Hino 155, and 9% less than the Isuzu NPR-HD.

According to ATDS, testing procedures used were formulated to meet requirements of SAE J1321 and SAE J1264 fuel consumption test procedures. The test was contracted specifically for the 2017 MY FE160 to measure effects of new hardware, including the electrically engaged radiator fan and new emissions aftertreatment equipment. Competitive models were selected based on readiness and regional commercial availability. Per respective engine emissions certifications from the US Environmental Protection Agency and CARB (California Air Resources Board), engine power, torque and emissions levels for both the Isuzu and Hino models were equivalent to the latest available for each at the time of testing.

To eliminate fuel gauge and in-dash odometer variability, the in-dash odometers and the trucks’ standard fuel tanks and fuel gauges were not used during testing. Identical auxiliary fuel tanks were mounted in the dry van box on each truck, and each truck was outfitted with Racelogic GPS and Rosco Video GPS data loggers. Fuel consumption was measured by weighing the full auxiliary fuel tank at the start of a run, and then weighing it again after each truck had completed the run. The difference was the amount of fuel consumed by each truck. The scale used to weigh the auxiliary fuel tanks had an accuracy of ±0.02 pounds (1/3 of an ounce).

For more details, visit www.mitfuso.com.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!

Sponsored Recommendations

The Future of Mirrors is Closer Than it Appears

Why Mirror Camera Systems are the next step for fleet safety and exoneration While many commercial trucking cameras are similarly marketed, they are not all created equally. The...

The 20:1 Solution: Unlocking the ROI of a Modern Asset Maintenance Solution

Discover how modern fleet maintenance software can drive step-change improvements in shop efficiency, cost control and vehicle productivity, along with how to calculate the ROI...

Digital and AI Solutions for Rideshare Safety

Anyline’s study, “How Digital AI Solutions Can Enhance Rideshare Safety,” reveals rideshare drivers are overly confident in their tire knowledge, risking passenger safety. Download...

Introducing the World’s First Mobile Tire Tread Scanner

Anyline’s innovation allows accurate tire tread measurement via any mobile device, ensuring legal compliance for fleets. Read more and find out how you can cut operating costs...