Photo: Stoneridge
Stoneridge

FMCSA to allow use of Stoneridge's camera system in place of mirrors

Dec. 31, 2018
FMCSA has granted Stoneridge Inc. a five-year exemption to install its camera-monitoring system on trucks instead of traditional rear-view mirrors.

The Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) has granted Stoneridge Inc. a five-year exemption to install its camera-monitoring system on trucks instead of traditional rear-view mirrors.

The company said “MirrorEye” uses integrated external digital cameras and digital monitors inside the cab. That provides an expanded field of view, full-color night vision, and the ability to continuously track the end of the trailer.

In a Federal Register posting, FMCSA said the “use of the MirrorEye system in lieu of mirrors would likely achieve a level of safety equivalent to or greater than the level of safety provided by the regulation.”

The notice also stated that Stoneridge believes the system could reduce driver fatigue “by requiring less head movement by drivers compared to the number of head movementneeded to use conventional mirrors.”

While the system is currently an aftermarket product, FMCSA’s decision could pave the way for MirrorEye and other camera systems to one day be built into new trucks.

Other companies including Daimler Trucks North America have requested exemptions to use cameras instead of mirrors. Besides safety benefits, these companies have also cited higher fuel efficiency through improved aerodynamics. 

In comments to FMCSA, truckload carriers Schneider and J.B. Hunt Transport Services said they have been using the system along with required mirrors.

Schneider said its truck drivers have "had an overwhelmingly positive experience" with the system, while J.B. Hunt wrote "we have not been involved in any collisions and have received overwhelming positive feedback from our test drivers."

However, the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance questioned whether the “technology has a proven safety benefit.” It also expressed concern whether the camera system could “undermine consistency and uniformity in compliance enforcement.”

About the Author

Neil Abt

Neil Abt is a former FleetOwner editor who wrote for the publication from 2017 to 2020. He was editorial director from 2018 to 2020.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!

Sponsored Recommendations

Take Control of Your Finances: A Practical Guide for Carriers in Trucking

This guide is designed to help you navigate these challenges, featuring strategies for automation, examples of effective tools, and a real-world success story from Phoenix Cargo...

Report: The 2024-2025 State Of Heavy-Duty Repair

Fullbay's fifth annual State of Heavy-Duty Repair compiles insights from almost 1,000 experts and over 3,500 shops. If you aren't leveraging these proven data points, your competition...

Guide For Managing Maintenance

The Guide for Managing Maintenance is a comprehensive resource designed to help fleet managers improve their maintenance operations, reduce downtime, and lower overall fleet costs...

The Road Ahead: 2025 Trucking and Fleet Insights

Discover how fleet operators are impacted by challenges like driver onboarding delays and complex compliance, and the critical need for technology to boost efficiency and cut ...