Siemens
Fleetowner 3015 Siemensturbine1
Fleetowner 3015 Siemensturbine1
Fleetowner 3015 Siemensturbine1
Fleetowner 3015 Siemensturbine1
Fleetowner 3015 Siemensturbine1

“Re-shoring” trend could benefit transportation

Sept. 17, 2012

Rising labor costs overseas as well as growing concerns over supply chain security could help increase efforts to relocate manufacturing operations back to the U.S., according to a new report – a strategy dubbed “re-shoring” that could significantly benefit domestic transportation operators.

“For years, the discussion of cost was focused on labor cost and labor ‘arbitrage’ but our report reveals that transportation costs, for heavy industry, will be a stronger influence in production location and logistics decisions going forward,” Bob McCutcheon, U.S. industrial products leader for global consulting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) told Fleet Owner.

“Shorter lead times and supply chain disruptions have led companies to begin reconsidering their strategy and move production closer to the customer,” he said.

PwC’s report – entitled A Homecoming for U.S. Manufacturing? – claims that seven factors could drive a sustained U.S. manufacturing “renaissance.” Those factors are: transportation and energy costs; currency fluctuations; U.S. market demand; labor costs; U.S. talent; availability of capital; and the tax and regulatory climate.

McCutcheon noted that relocating manufacturing production to the U.S. generally holds greater advantages for some industries over others.

“When taking into account costs spanning labor, materials, transportation and energy, our report shows that chemicals, primary metals and heavy equipment manufacturing industries stand to benefit most from maintaining or expanding facilities in the U.S. given opportunities and cost incentives to re-shore domestically,” he said. “Wood, plastic and rubber products companies could also benefit from changes in domestic costs, but lower net imports in these industries may limit the full economic benefits of on-shoring in the U.S.”

He added that “localizing” production can also help mitigate supply chain disruptions, which totaled $2.2 billion in financial impact for U.S. industrial products companies last year.

However, the direct benefit to trucking from “re-shoring” initiatives may be mixed at best, McCutcheon cautioned.

“Certainly an increase in domestic manufacturing will result in an increase in domestic shipping and we also believe that, with rising fuel costs, transportation is playing an increased role in the cost of production and sales,” he explained. “But the benefits for trucking specifically are not clear. While there should be increased activity, trucking is still a higher-cost mode. Shipments may also move to slower, yet more fuel efficient (thus less costly) modes as well, which could partially off-set some of the benefits.”

Still, McCutcheon stressed that the “bull market” in energy commodities over the last decade has contributed to a major increase in transportation costs for manufacturers with global supply chains.

“Given growing global demand for energy, transportation costs will likely remain elevated – thus making production closer to home more attractive,” he pointed out. “This can also cut down on lead times, reduce inventory levels, mitigate some currency risks, increase control over intellectual property and reduce supply chain disruption risks.”

For those reasons, McCutcheon emphasized, industrial manufacturers may increasingly rethink their U.S. strategies – including the merits of continuing to separate production and R&D and producing abroad and importing back to U.S. buyers. 

“Depending on the industry, there may be considerable benefits to establishing regionalized supply chains and R&D facilities in the U.S., such as reducing costs, shortening lead times, protecting intellectual property and mitigating many of the risk factors inherent in developing markets,” he noted.

“As a result, transport companies need to focus on understanding the changing supply chain landscape, McCutcheon stressed. “This shift to short routes and manufacturing closer to the customer, as well as a diversified regional supply chain strategy could result in significant changes in customer behavior.” 

About the Author

Sean Kilcarr | Editor in Chief

Sean reports and comments on trends affecting the many different strata of the trucking industry -- light and medium duty fleets up through over-the-road truckload, less-than-truckload, and private fleet operations Also be sure to visit Sean's blog Trucks at Work where he offers analysis on a variety of different topics inside the trucking industry.

Sponsored Recommendations

Stop Sweating Temperature Excursions

Advanced chemical indicators give you the peace of mind that comes from reliable insights into your supply chains. Compromised shipments can be identified the moment they arrive...

How Electric Vehicles Help You Prolong the Life of Your Fleet

Before adopting electric vehicles for commercial/government fleets, prioritize cost inquiries. Maintenance is essential; understand the upkeep of EV fleets. Here’s what you need...

How to Choose the Right Route Planning Solution

This free buyer's guide will help equip you with the knowledge and insights needed to analyze route planning software and vendors in the market and, ultimately, make an informed...

How to Put Your Trucking Data to Work

How fleets can overcome data overload to optimize operations and get ahead.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!