• EPA adds new research to Phase 2 GHG proposal

    Agency calls for comment on powertrain, aero reports
    March 2, 2016
    2 min read
    Image

    The federal government has come up with new information related to the next round of fuel efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions standards for heavy-duty trucks, and the agencies behind the proposal are calling for another round of public comment on the latest additions to the rulemaking docket.

    According to the notice published Wednesday in the Federal Register, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) are soliciting additional comment on “certain revised test reports," and a revised version of the Greenhouse Gas Emission Model (GEM) used in developing the proposed standards.

    The new information includes powertrain data; additional aerodynamic test data; supplemental test data relating to drive cycles for vocational vehicles; and cycle average mapping data.

    The agencies proposed the Phase 2 Heavy-Duty National Program last July, and the original public comment period closed Oct. 1. The current period runs through April 1, and the Wednesday notice emphasizes that the agencies will not address “new comments extraneous to these materials.”

    In an update on the GHG proposal, Stemco’s Fritz Marinko told attendees at the Technology & Maintenance Council’s annual meeting this week the rule is slated to be finalized this summer, “but in reality it could be extended.”

    Also uncertain is the extent to which the final rule will accede to the more stringent standards and a more aggressive implementation schedule sought by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). Specifically, CARB wants the rule to push for more advanced technologies, to address aerodynamics in vocational vehicles, and “knowing CARB, they’re always concerned about NOx,” Marinko explained. And all this by 2024, rather than 2027 timetable sought by the trucking industry.

    “CARB has publicly stated that they’re very committed to single, strong program,” Marinko said. “But the reality is if they don’t like what written, they’re going to write their own. Six to twelve months after the federal regulation becomes law, they will come with their own regulation. They’re going to do their own thing, no matter what the federal regulation is.”

    To review or to comment on “Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Fuel Efficiency Standards for Medium- and Heavy-Duty Engines and Vehicles - Phase 2,” go here on regulations.gov.

    About the Author

    Kevin Jones 1

    Editor

    Kevin has served as editor-in-chief of Trailer/Body Builders magazine since 2017—just the third editor in the magazine’s 60 years. He is also editorial director for Endeavor Business Media’s Commercial Vehicle group, which includes FleetOwner, Bulk Transporter, Refrigerated Transporter, American Trucker, and Fleet Maintenance magazines and websites.

    Voice your opinion!

    To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!

    Sign up for our free eNewsletters

    Latest from Regulations

    PBS News
    Trump speaks before signing resolutions
    Trump signed three resolutions to terminate CARB’s waivers for Advanced Clean Trucks, Advanced Clean Cars II, and Heavy-Duty NOx. The resolutions are a major blow to California...
    ID 1069347 © Badboo | Dreamstime.com
    traffic sign without language
    Is ELP enforcement an important safety issue? Take a few seconds to share your thoughts and see what others said.
    FleetOwner/Endeavor Business Media
    trucks_cr_fo
    Stricter enforcement of cabotage laws, carrier leaders said, will help bring supply-demand balance to the market, creating 'a little bit of optimism.'