Limiting speed doesn’t mean limiting efficiency

Oct. 3, 2016
There are arguments both for and against speed limiters, but the reality is many fleets have been limiting their vehicle speeds for safety and fuel economy.

It’s likely that there will be a final ruling on limiting the speed of heavy-duty trucks as the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration recently issued a Notice of Proposed Rule Making.

There are arguments both for and against speed limiters, but the reality is that many fleets have been limiting their vehicle speeds for years for both safety and fuel economy reasons.

Speed can be adjusted in a number of ways including by limiting horsepower, RPM or overall top speed through the vehicle’s engine control module. According to Tom Poduch, Transervice’s Director of Logistics Design, “Fleets such as Transervice, adjust vehicle speed and overall engine performance to meet the specific requirements of the product being hauled, operating environment and anticipated road grades with the goal of maximizing vehicle fuel economy.”

The primary concern with limited speed is that more resources such as drivers and trucks will have to be added to the fleet to maintain the high level of service expected by the customer. Static delivery windows may become a challenge.

The reality is with some modifications to the routing there should be little-to-no loss of efficiency even when operating at lower speeds. Computer-based route modeling allows the user to insert limitless variables into the system and adjust the algorithm behavior to develop an achievable baseline model. “The baseline can take into account product ready times, delivery windows, vehicle availability/capacity, priority delivery points and expected road speeds,” Poduch explains.

We use an optimization tool that looks at driver and vehicle performance focusing on road speed(s), hard braking, idle time, fuel economy, etc.

Once the baseline is completed, local knowledge, utilization historical data and driver feedback can be used to determine the viability of the model.

If additional resources are still needed, investigate if they can be offset by opening the windows of delivery, changing the delivery day of a set delivery point, or try a new trailer configuration. “Testing these dynamic modifications using computer modeling will identify opportunities to further meet current and future fleet demands efficiently, while minimizing the impact of fuel economy, resources or customer service,” Poduch says.

Whether or not the federal government decides to limit speeds, or if you decide to do it yourself, route optimization can keep asset utilization high, get deliveries made on time and continue to keep customers satisfied, all while improving your fuel economy, tire wear and overall cost. It can become a WIN-WIN, depending on how you approach it. For more information visit www.transervice.com.

About the Author

Joseph Evangelist

Joseph is a seasoned transportation executive with domestic and international experience in sales, operations, mergers and acquisition with heavy emphasis on post-acquisition assimilation planning to maximize new growth and business combination opportunities.

He joined Transervice in 2007 and currently serves as executive vice president with sales, operations and staff responsibilities. He is also heavily involved in new business development and account management.

Previously he was president of LLT International, Inc., an international transportation consulting firm with operations in the U.S. and the Far East. He oversaw the maintenance and fleet management of a 2,000-vehicle cement distribution fleet in Indonesia.

Joseph was also president and CEO of Lend Lease Trucks Inc., a truck rental, leasing and dedicated carriage firm with operations throughout the U.S.

He also was vice president/general manager of The Hertz Corporation – Truck Division, a subsidiary of The Hertz Corp. While there he participated in the acquisition and successful integration of the Canadian licensee operations.

Continue Reading

Sponsored Recommendations

Reducing CSA Violations & Increasing Safety With Advanced Trailer Telematics

Keep the roads safer with advanced trailer telematics. In this whitepaper, see how you can gain insights that lead to increased safety and reduced roadside incidents—keeping drivers...

80% Fewer Towable Accidents - 10 Key Strategies

After installing grille guards on all of their Class 8 trucks, a major Midwest fleet reported they had reduced their number of towable accidents by 80% post installation – including...

Proactive Fleet Safety: A Guide to Improved Efficiency and Profitability

Each year, carriers lose around 32.6 billion vehicle hours as a result of weather-related congestion. Discover how to shift from reactive to proactive, improve efficiency, and...

Tackling the Tech Shortage: Lessons in Recruiting Talent and Reducing Turnover

Discover innovative strategies for recruiting and retaining tech talent in the trucking industry at our April 16th webinar, where experts will share insights on competitive pay...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!

Latest from Regulations

FMCSA
Frank C. Alegre Trucking, Inc.
60870789 | Vitpho | Dreamstime.com

Most Read

Sponsored