Image

OOIDA sues over ELD final rule

Dec. 16, 2015
While the “Petition for Review” filed by the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) does not outline specific challenges to the electronic logging device (ELD) final rule, the group noted a lawsuit it filed four years ago vacated a similar ELD rule over the issue of driver harassment.

The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association (OOIDA) filed a lawsuit this week over the electronic logging device (ELD) final rule recently issued by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA); a rule that will require model year 2000 and newer trucks engaged in interstate commerce to shift over to ELDs within the next two years.

“This rule has the potential to have the single largest, most negative impact on the industry than anything else done by FMCSA,” noted Jim Johnston, OOIDA’s president and CEO, in a statement. “We intend to fight it with everything we have available.”

The group noted that its “Petition for Review” does not at this time outline the “arguments” that OOIDA will uses to challenge the ELD final rule, with said “arguments” to be provided in subsequent filings and during oral arguments in front of the court.

In August 2011, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit vacated a proposed electronic logbook rule based on OOIDA’s argument that the rule did not address the harassment of drivers. The new ELD rule strictly prohibits driver harassment by providing both procedural and technical provisions to prevent harassment resulting from ELD-generated information.

separate FMCSA rulemaking further safeguards drivers from being coerced to violate HOS regulations, providing the agency with the authority to take enforcement actions not only against motor carriers, but also against shippers, receivers, and transportation intermediaries.

“This regulation is absolutely the most outrageous intrusion into the rights of professional truckers imaginable and will do nothing at all to improve highway safety,” OOIDA’s Johnston added. “In fact, we firmly believe it will do exactly the opposite by placing even more pressure and stress on drivers than they already deal with.”

About the Author

Fleet Owner Staff

Our Editorial Team

Kevin Jones, Editorial Director, Commercial Vehicle Group

Cristina Commendatore, Executive Editor

Scott Achelpohl, Managing Editor 

Josh Fisher, Senior Editor

Catharine Conway, Digital Editor

Eric Van Egeren, Art Director

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of FleetOwner, create an account today!

Sponsored Recommendations

Optimizing your fleet safety program using AI

Learn how AI supports fleet safety programs with tools for compliance monitoring, driver coaching and incident analysis to reduce risks and improve efficiency.

Mitigate Risk with Data from Route Scores

Route Scores help fleets navigate the risk factors they encounter in the lanes they travel, helping to keep costs down.

Uniting for Bold Solutions to Tackle Transportation’s Biggest Challenges

Over 300 leaders in transportation, logistics, and distribution gathered at Ignite 2024. From new products to innovative solutions, Ignite highlighted the importance of strong...

Seasonal Strategies for Maintaining a Safe & Efficient Fleet Year-Round

Prepare your fleet for every season! From winterizing vehicles to summer heat safety, our eBook covers essential strategies for year-round fleet safety. Download now to reduce...